Platypus JavaScript Editor 1.22 serial key or number

Pack: C5-0CLS-0FLT-00RA-0001 Elite Force: F9YN-C433-K9RB-4RTP-15 Emperor: Battle for Dune: 036642-256734-246754-5204 F1 2001: 1500-5165912-5287147-7137 F1 2002: 7931-9865028-6024865-1156 F1 Championship 2000: 4500-3623232-6755239-5676 F1 Championship Season 2000: 1500-8510031-6424109-3971 FIFA 2001: 4521-0294200-3549899-3446 FIFA 2002: 1111-1111111-1111111-1111 FIFA Worldcup 2002: 5501-2376301-3049573-5562

Freedom Force : 3615-4209737-2601657-1161 Gore: 5a67-8eaf-8863-e05e Ground Control: RAC2-RAL2-CAS3-RAD3-3542 HalfLife CounterStrike: 3029-74897-4246 HalfLife: Game of the Year Edition: 4336-04196-6119 HalfLife: Gunman Chronicles: 2609-57245-0368 HalfLife: Opposing Force XYN5-SAB2-NEL2-PUW3-2585 HalfLife: 9692-69501-7311 Harry Potter: 0901-7014788-4117807-0206 Homeworld Cataclysm: GAF6-CAB4-SEX5-ZYL6-2622 Homeworld: BAG5-LEJ3-MAN7-SUL2-3696 Initial Encounter: 0176-11134-0245 Insane: N7NE-EED8-WQ2A-76MW-A4 Kingdom Underfire: E1KJ-RL62-COO7-FT96 Madden 2001: 1500-6610360-1643530-0243 Madden NFL 2001: 1500 6610360 1643530 0243 Medal of Honor: Assult Allies: 5000-0000000-0000000-5068 Motoracer 3 (b?rmi pl. csak pontok) MS Flight Downunder 2000: EMKP-TJJK-LABF-VSWT MS Lauda 425 FlightSim Addon: 033-0400-09000001111805 Nascar 2000: 14044 BUSY LISA SLOP VIVA NASCAR 4: GAC7-REB8-TUX6-DAC2-7833 NASCAR Craftsman Truck Series: DES6-DAB2-ZEL6-CAX2-5799 NASCAR Racing 2002 Season: RAF2-RAL2-RAS2-RAX2-6667 NBA 2001: 2001-0020601-0010978-6694 Need For Speed 5: 14077 BUSY CODA CALF BIFF Neverwinter Nights: QFETM-MPU3X-DN6FF-MHFDA-YWARA-4HMPE-RDJTG NHL 2001: 1500-5381519-0421709-2522 NHL 2002: 1500-2508797-3152323-6221 Nox: 017896-376549-071924-5507 Operation Flashpoint: PMKJ-LSD9C-KHGE4-91RGZ-6JKT3 Operation Flashpoint Resistance Add-on:HRKF RRAXF FXWP3 PZ0BP DAG27 Outlive: c61e41-a3f465-4674c1-ace71f Quake 3: Arena w2r7jsdgphat3lbc Quake 3: Team Arena TSBH-7CCG-DPWP-B2LT-84

S.W.A.T 3 Serial : BAC2-BAB2-BAB2-BAB2-2352 Sacrifice Serial : 1254-2556-4785-2254 Sega GT Serial : GTJ08010-322007-01723 Shogun Total War Serial : 1600-0052410-0052410-6424 Shogun Total War : Warlord Edition Serial : 0901-3721384-64270-58-7026 SimCoaster Serial : 2001-0013101-0010978-2823 Sid Meier?rias Serial : 1500-9874009-0973804-6601

The Typing Of The Dead Serial : TDK02200-176403-17407 Throne Of Darkness Serial : RAC2-RAD2-RAC2-RAC2-3387 Tiger Woo

Page too long and unwieldy? Try adding nominations viewer to your scripts page.

Here, we determine which articles are to be featured articles (FAs). FAs exemplify Wikipedia's very best work and satisfy the FA criteria. All editors are welcome to review nominations; please see the review FAQ. Before nominating an article, nominators may wish to receive feedback by listing it at Peer review. Editors considering their first nomination, and any subsequent nomination before their first FA promotion, are strongly advised to seek the involvement of a mentor, to assist in the preparation and processing of the nomination. Nominators must be sufficiently familiar with the subject matter and sources to deal with objections during the featured article candidates (FAC) process. Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult regular editors of the article before nominating it. Nominators are expected to respond positively to constructive criticism and to make efforts to address objections promptly. An article should not be on Featured article candidates and Peer review or Good article nominations at the same time. The FAC coordinators—Ian Rose, Laser brain and Ealdgyth—determine the timing of the process for each nomination. For a nomination to be promoted to FA status, consensus must be reached that it meets the criteria. Consensus is built among reviewers and nominators; the coordinators determine whether there is consensus. A nomination will be removed from the list and archived if, in the judgment of the coordinators: actionable objections have not been resolved; consensus for promotion has not been reached; insufficient information has been provided by reviewers to judge whether the criteria have been met; or a nomination is unprepared, after at least one reviewer has suggested it be withdrawn. It is assumed that all nominations have good qualities; this is why the main thrust of the process is to generate and resolve critical comments in relation to the criteria, and why such resolution is given considerably more weight than declarations of support. Please do not use graphics or templates on FAC nomination pages. Graphics such as  Done and Not done slow down the page load time, and complex templates can lead to errors in the FAC archives. The only templates that are acceptable are {{xt}}, {{!xt}}, and {{tq}}; templates such as {{green}} that apply colours to text and are used to highlight examples; and {{collapse top}} and {{collapse bottom}}, used to hide offtopic discussions. An editor is allowed to be the sole nominator of only one article at a time, but two nominations may be allowed if the editor is a co-nominator on at least one of them. If a nomination is archived, the nominator(s) should take adequate time to work on resolving issues before re-nominating. None of the nominators may nominate or co-nominate any article for two weeks unless given leave to do so by a coordinator; if such an article is nominated without asking for leave, a coordinator will decide whether to remove it. A coordinator may exempt from this restriction an archived nomination that attracted no (or minimal) feedback. To contact the FAC coordinators, please leave a message on the FAC talk page, or use the {{@FAC}} notification template elsewhere. A bot will update the article talk page after the article is promoted or the nomination archived; the delay in bot processing can range from minutes to several days, and the template should remain on the talk page until the bot updates . Table of Contents – This page:Purge cache, Checklinks, Check redirects, Dablinks

Featured content: Featured article candidates (FAC) Featured article review (FAR) Today's featured article (TFA): Featured article tools:

Nomination procedure Before nominating an article, ensure that it meets all of the FA criteria and that peer reviews are closed and archived. The featured article toolbox (at right) can help you check some of the criteria. Place at the top of the talk page of the nominated article and save the page. From the FAC template, click on the red "initiate the nomination" link or the blue "leave comments" link. You will see pre-loaded information; leave that text. If you are unsure how to complete a nomination, please post to the FAC talk page for assistance. Below the preloaded title, complete the nomination page, sign with ~~~~, and save the page. Copy this text: (substituting Number), and edit this page (i.e., the page you are reading at the moment), pasting the template at the top of the list of candidates. Replace "name of ..." with the name of your nomination. This will transclude the nomination into this page. In the event that the title of the nomination page differs from this format, use the page's title instead. Supporting and opposing To respond to a nomination, click the "Edit" link to the right of the article nomination (not the "Edit this page" link for the whole FAC page). All editors are welcome to review nominations; see the review FAQ for an overview of the review process. To support a nomination, write *'''Support''', followed by your reason(s), which should be based on a full reading of the text. If you have been a significant contributor to the article before its nomination, please indicate this. A reviewer who specializes in certain areas of the FA criteria should indicate whether the support is applicable to all of the criteria. To oppose a nomination, write *'''Object''' or *'''Oppose''', followed by your reason(s). Each objection must provide a specific rationale that can be addressed. If nothing can be done in principle to address the objection, a coordinator may disregard it. References on style and grammar do not always agree; if a contributor cites support for a certain style in a standard reference work or other authoritative source, reviewers should consider accepting it. Reviewers who object are strongly encouraged to return after a few days to check whether their objection has been addressed. To withdraw the objection, strike it out (with ) rather than removing it. Alternatively, reviewers may transfer lengthy, resolved commentary to the FAC archive talk page, leaving a link in a note on the FAC archive. To provide constructive input on a nomination without specifically supporting or objecting, write *'''Comment''' followed by your advice. For ease of editing, a reviewer who enters lengthy commentary may create a neutral fourth-level subsection, named either ==== Review by EditorX ==== or ==== Comments by EditorX ==== (do not use third-level or higher section headers). Please do not create subsections for short statements of support or opposition—for these a simple *'''Support''',*'''Oppose''', or *'''Comment''' followed by your statement of opinion, is sufficient. Please do not use a semicolon to bold a subheading; this creates accessibility problems. If a nominator feels that an Oppose has been addressed, they should say so, either after the reviewer's signature, or by interspersing their responses in the list provided by the reviewer. Per talk page guidelines, nominators should not cap, alter, strike, or add graphics to comments from other editors. If a nominator finds that an opposing reviewer is not returning to the nomination page to revisit improvements, this should be noted on the nomination page, with a diff to the reviewer's talk page showing the request to reconsider.

Nominations[edit]

Heaven Upside Down[edit]

Nominator(s): Homeostasis07 (talk/contributions) 00:32, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

This article is about Marilyn Manson's tenth studio album Heaven Upside Down. It has recently gone through GA and peer reviews, and I believe it meets the FA criteria. Would appreciate any feedback at all. Thanks. Homeostasis07 (talk/contributions) 00:32, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

In the Aeroplane Over the Sea[edit]

Nominator(s): Famous Hobo (talk) 22:36, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Alright, third times the charm. Hopefully.

This article is about In the Aeroplane Over the Sea, one of the most widely beloved and incessantly mocked indie rock albums ever made. With weirdly named instruments and even weirder lyrics (this is the "semen stains the mountaintop" album), In the Aeroplane Over the Sea is a bizarre album that in theory shouldn't work, but my goodness it does.

The first FAC nomination failed because I had personal issues to attend to so I couldn't respond to comments. The second FAC nomination failed because of not enough comments. Now it's back (with a brand new aftermath section courtesy of BLZ. @Aoba47:, @Casliber: (as the two editors who supported the FAC last time, sorry to keep making you guys do this), @Nikkimaria: (as the editor who supported the FAC based on a source review), and @Buidhe: as the editor who gave the media review. Famous Hobo (talk) 22:36, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Support from Cas Liber[edit]

Okay then...looking good...

@Casliber: How does the sentence look now? Also took care of the other issue. Famous Hobo (talk) 09:44, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

All good now Cas Liber (talk·contribs) 11:04, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

The Who by Numbers Tour[edit]

Nominator(s): Chrisnait (talk | contribs) 21:16, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

This article is about The Who by Numbers Tour, a 1975-76 tour by the Who. The tour was the final tour by the band's legendary drummer Keith Moon. The article has gone through two peer reviews, one successful GA nomination, and one successful DYK nomination. Feel free to leave any comments and suggestions below. Thank you. Chrisnait (talk | contribs) 21:16, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Oppose. Sorry. We need more work on the prose. I have made a few edits. Can you see the problem here; "The Who returned to America in 1976 after playing four shows in Europe. The leg set indoor concert attendance records, and the Who returned in America in 1976 after playing four shows in Europe"? I suggest withdrawing this nomination and returning to FAC after a fresh pair of eyes has polished the prose. Graham Beards (talk) 21:46, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

• Thank you for the edits. I removed the part you mentioned in your comment and added a sentence in the lead section about Moon. Chrisnait (talk | contribs) 01:24, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

• Oppose This looks more like a WP:FL than a FA. I second Graham's comments, for example you need to introduce Moon in the main body of the article, and the set list is not sourced. (t · c) buidhe 23:01, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

• I disagree about the FL part. The Breeders Tour 2014 is another tour-related article, and it is a FA. Also, the set list is sourced. I made it more obvious by adding another sentence. Chrisnait (talk | contribs) 01:24, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Cups (song)[edit]

Nominator(s): The Ultimate Boss (talk) 03:33, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

"Cups" is a song originally written by Lulu and the Lampshades. The song is a version of "When I'm Gone", a 1931 song by the Carter Family. Anna Kendrick released a cover version of the song entitled "Cups (Pitch Perfect's "When I'm Gone")". The song grew to be a worldwide phenomenon, with many artists uploading their own covers on social media. Kendrick's version reached number 6 on the US Billboard Hot 100. I'm open to any suggestions. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 03:33, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Support from LOVI33[edit]

Article looks amazing!!! Defiantly ready for FA. You have my support. LOVI33 01:09, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Chinese nationality law[edit]

Nominator(s): Horserice (talk) 05:03, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

This article is about Chinese nationality law. The framework for a lot of these regulations was created in the waning years of the Qing dynasty, through which we can take a peek into the monarchy's views on the rest of the world at that time. This article just passed GA review and I think it's ready to be reviewed here. Horserice (talk) 05:03, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Image review—pass

Only image looks OK for copyright (t · c) buidhe 18:11, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Comment

The article is very short for a FA, only 1939 words of readable prose. I am surprised that there is not more to say about this topic. (t · c) buidhe 18:15, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Kentucky Kingdom[edit]

Nominator(s): BlueShirtz (talk) 06:00, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

This article is about the Kentucky Kingdom amusement park, located in Louisville, Kentucky. Plans for the amusement park were created in 1977 by the Kentucky State Fair Board, as a proposal to expand the Kentucky Fair and Exposition Center grounds. Kentucky Kingdom opened in 1987 as a park focused on the commonwealth of Kentucky's history and culture, but filed for bankruptcy after one season. Businessman Ed Hart purchased the park's operating rights in 1989, and reopened the park one year later. Under Ed Hart's leadership, attendance increased by 1.1 million people in seven years, making Kentucky Kingdom the fastest growing amusement park in North America. Kentucky Kingdom's success led to Six Flags, a national amusement park operator, purchasing the park in 1998. The park, now known as Six Flags Kentucky Kingdom, began to experience a decline in attendance, as the company brought smaller additions to Kentucky Kingdom. After Six Flags filed for bankruptcy, the company announced in 2010 that they would no longer operate Kentucky Kingdom, and for five years the park was closed as the local government searched for a new operator. In 2013, Ed Hart announced that he would return to operating Kentucky Kingdom, and the park reopened one year later. Since Hart's return in 2014, Kentucky Kingdom has added new attractions and seen a growth attendance every season.

I began working on this article in April, and it was promoted to Good Article status in May. Throughout the past five months I've added 131 sources, new images, new sections of the article, as well as expanding older sections of the article. Many of the sources that I added were from local newspapers and magazines that featured information about Kentucky Kingdom that had not been documented on the internet. Because of the recent of expansion of this article, I believe that this article meets the qualifications to be classified as a Featured Article.

Comments on images

Comments by Spicy

Thanks for putting this up for FA. I can tell you have put a lot of work into this article - the history section in particular is quite detailed. I think that the article will need some more work to meet the FA criteria, though. Here are some things I noticed while skimming; this is not meant to be comprehensive.

• - "the parks" should be "the park's". This is a rather long and unwieldy sentence. Is "years of planning" necessary? Presumably most amusement parks take a significant amount of time to plan. "at a cost of $12 million" is too far away from its referent, making the sentence awkward to read. This could be rephrased to something like:

"In 1977, the Kentucky State Fair Board announced plans to build a theme park on the grounds of the Kentucky Fair and Exposition Center. The park's construction, overseen by Kentucky Entertainment Limited, began in 1986 and cost $12 million in total. Kentucky Kingdom opened to the public on May 23, 1987..." (the specific phrasing could be improved but this is just an example of how to restructure the sentence)

• $12 million in 1987 dollars, or 2020 dollars? Also, the $12 million figure does not appear in the article body. The lead is supposed to summarize the article; it generally shouldn't contain information that isn't in the main article text.
• -> there is a lot going on in this sentence and it's out of chronological order which makes it a confusing read. Should probably be split into two, and mention the acquisition by Six Flags and the 2009 closing before the re-opening
• There are 4 social media links in the infobox; should only be one per WP:ELMINOFFICIAL
• - Do we need this much detail about their schedule in the lead? Remember that this is supposed to be a high-level summary. This information doesn't seem to be in the body of the article, either.
• The lead should be expanded. From WP:LEAD: Think of the lead as a mini-version of the article, and keep in mind that many people only read the lead, so it should be a reasonably detailed summary of the article's content. The article's history section, for example, is very detailed but all the lead tells us is when it was opened, closed, and bought.
• - why the quotes?
• - WP:SEAOFBLUE and WP:OVERLINK issues; the governor and mayoral positions are not particularly relevant to this article so no need to link them
• - comma splice
• - slang/jargon; would change to "children's area"
• - the "10-acre" part kind of shows up out of nowhere. Wouldn't this fit better in the previous paragraph which talks about visitors complaining about the size of the park? The previous paragraph says it was planned to be 13 acres, did it end up being smaller or did the source round the figure down?
• - perhaps nitpicky, but I imagine it didn't close because of having few attractions, but because it didn't attract enough guests due to having few attractions...
• What makes hellotravel.comthemeparktourist.com, davealthoff.comparkvault.net, this Youtube channel, thrillhunter.comultimaterollercoaster.com, moxietalk.com, etc. FA quality sources? Many sources seem to be fan pages, commercial sites, or blogs. These would not satisfy the basic WP:RS criteria, let alone the FAC requirements for .
• - comma splice. There are a few others throughout the article.
• - what is "the Starchaser"? It is not mentioned previously and the reader has no indication of what it is or why it is important
• - repetitive
• The NFCC rationale for File:Bluegrass Boardwalk logo.png is incorrect, it is not . I think this logo would fail NFCC in any case because there is no discussion of the logo itself in the article.
• Images should have alt text.
• - article says it opened in 2016 so why future tense?
• Many entries in the list of rides are lacking inline citations
• In light of WP:NPF and WP:BLPPRIVACY, I would avoid giving the names of non-notable children in the "Incidents" section. It is unnecessary and adds nothing to the reader's understanding of the topic.
• - of course the park owner has good things to say about the park. This is promotionalism, not encyclopedic content.

I would recommend seeking a copyedit and a peer review from Wikipedia:WikiProject Amusement Parks members to ensure this article is ready for FAC. Spicy (talk) 17:24, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Comments from CR4ZE

Thank you first of all for your commendable effort to improve this page over the past few months. The article has developed along sound lines and I can see there's potential for a true FA, however I think that is still quite far down the line from here. I have read through and echo the concerns voiced above, and have outlined a few of my own below:

• The prose does not meet 1a, b & c:
• "The park closed and filed for bankruptcy after only one season, due to low attendance numbers, which were contributed to the small amount of attractions and poor weather conditions throughout the 1987 season", "There was also more tables, chairs and benches and smoother, quicker season pass process processing and in-person purchases through technology improvements"—among other examples.
• Much of the article reads like proseline and lacks connection:
• "On May 29, Kentucky Kingdom announced...", "On June 9, Kentucky Kingdom announced...", "However on June 25, the park announced..." is one of many notable examples.
• Note that when running through multiple dates with a single a year, you shouldn't refer back to the year each single time. The prose in 1.4 - Attempts to revive the park (2010–12) really suffers here.
• "the park made its biggest investment yet with the addition of Chang" is puffery.
• Many sentences could be recast in active voice and this would improve the prose's cadence and flow.
• Numerous instances of choppy paragraphs. Three paragraphs less than three lines in "1.5 - Ed Hart's latest return" alone.
• Attendance figures are visited a handful of times, there's some commentary on the park's growth, initial public criticism of its small footprint is mentioned, and there's a "top 10 amusement parks" listicle from MSN Travel (notability?). Beyond that, I just don't see the level of comprehensive analysis on earnings/industry performance/awards/attendance/etc that is expected of an FA. Perhaps you have indeed exhausted the available literature, but the article leaves the impression there is much more that could be said.
• The tables don't meet 2b & c:
• The table format for the attractions list isn't kind on the eyes. Perhaps this is personal preference, but I wonder how this would look converted to prose. A glaring concern is that almost none of these table entries cite reliable sources. If individual attractions can't be cited in any way, it raises the question of whether a protracted list is encyclopedic content.
• Perhaps former attractions could be forked into a child article to improve page readability.
• Inconsistent height formatting: The Giant Wheel is listed as a "150 ft (46 m) tall Ferris wheel" but FearFall is a "A 129-foot tall drop tower ride".
• References look solid. Note several journals are missing publisher fields (ie The Courier-Journal is published by Gannett). It would be nice (not required) to see archiving.
• The article is well-illustrated with plenty of free media. However, I really don't see the non-free File:Bluegrass Boardwalk logo.png as additive to the article. The rationale for why this can't be conveyed through text alone remains unclear.
• Images in the roller coaster table lack alt text.
• One {{Citation needed}} tag noted.

I feel that the level of clean-up required extends beyond the scope of this review. As such, unfortunately in its current state I would oppose this candidacy. I am happy to revisit this if you can address my concerns, or I can give input at a future peer review. Please do let me know if you would like follow-up. — CR4ZE(T • C) 15:56, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Arthur Sullivan (Australian soldier)[edit]

Nominator(s): Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:29, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

The twelfth and last instalment in my series of Featured Articles on South Australian Victoria Cross and George Cross recipients, Arthur Sullivan was a bank clerk who enlisted too late to serve in World War I. After the war ended he sought discharge from the Australian Army and joined the British North Russian Relief Force. He fought during the Allied intervention in the Russian Civil War, where he saved the lives of four members of his unit who had fallen into a river, some of whom had been wounded, and did all of this under intense fire from Bolshevik troops. Awarded the Victoria Cross, he survived the intervention and returned to Australia where he continued his successful career in banking. His reticence to talk of his exploits meant that he became known as the "Shy VC". He died in a freak accident while in London for the coronation of King George VI as part of the Australian Coronation Contingent in 1937. Have at it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:29, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Image review

• Some images are missing alt text, while the VC has two
• Don't use fixed px size. Nikkimaria (talk) 17:10, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks Nikkimaria, all done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:00, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Support by Hog Farm[edit]

I'll try to take a look at this soon. Probably gonna claim 5 WikiCup points for this. Hog Farm_Bacon 02:16, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, but don't bust a gut, Hog Farm. I'm going to have limited internet access from this Saturday till about 5 Oct. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:26, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

But I have to have something to do during boring university classes Hog Farm_Bacon 02:37, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

• Infobox gives the birthplace as Crystal Brook, but the prose says he was technically born in Prospect, although he was raised in Crystal Brook. I get there's some question as to which one it was, based on the note, but you align with one in the prose and one in the body. Might be worth having the birthplace note in the infobox too, unless you consider it to be clutter

Fixed to be consistent. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:56, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

• "On 30 October of the following year he returned to his home state" - Comma after year? I'm not good with commas, though, so I'll defer to your judgment on this.

I don't think it is necessary. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:56, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

• "He played golf and football" - Which football? Association or Aussie Rules?

Good point, Aussie Rules of course. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:56, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

• " training camp at Heytesbury, Wiltshire on 5 October 1918" - Geographic comma after Wiltshire?

Yep, added. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:56, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

• " on board the Steigerwald" - What type of ship is this?

cargo ship. Added. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:56, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

sure. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:56, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

• "aboard the Nestor" - Either provide the ship type, or drop "the"

troopship. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:56, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

• "the manager of the Casino, New South Wales branch of the bank - Comma after New South Wales?

yep, added. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:56, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

• "embarked at Melbourne on the SS Oronsay" - Drop "the" or call it a troopship or whatever it was

ocean liner, added. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:56, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

• "The Oronsay sailed" - Drop "the", ship names without classes don't have the the

dropped. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:56, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

• "Chauvel was also a friend of Sullivan's and, as a director of the National Bank of Australasia, also knew Sullivan on a professional level." - Is there a way to remove one of the two alsos here

dropped one. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:56, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

That's it for the prose stuff from me. Hog Farm_Bacon 14:49, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for taking a look, Hog Farm, all done I reckon. Anything else? Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:56, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Republic of Guria[edit]

Nominator(s): Kaiser matias (talk) 02:43, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Guria is a region in western Georgia, and a century ago was a hive of activity for Georgian socialism. The so-called Gurian Republic, which was more a quasi-rebellion than organised state, was sort of a trial run for the Georgian Mensheviks, many of whom would play leading roles in the first Georgian republic in 1918-1921. The article went through GA, and a thorough copyedit during a Peer Review (credit to @K.e.coffman and @Daniel Case for their help there). Now looking at the next step. Kaiser matias (talk) 02:43, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Source review

• Can we get ISBN or OCLC for all print sources?

Done for all but the Zhghenti book. Honestly I can hardly find anything online from it, aside from being cited in other works. Kaiser matias (talk) 01:39, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

• Reliability of sources looks OK for what they are being cited for.
• Ideally there would be a verifiable source for the Russian and Georgian translations.

@Buidhe: I noticed you tagged the translations. I'll be happy to go and find some sources, but it may take a couple days (really wish I could get access to the university library again). Kaiser matias (talk) 00:57, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

• Source checks TBD (t · c) buidhe 16:07, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Image review

I'm far from well-versed in copyright regulations, so am not sure how we would go about that, but am willing to do the work if you have suggestions. Kaiser matias (talk) 01:39, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

According to Georgian copyright law, "Copyright shall commence upon creation of a work and shall run for the life of the author and for 70 years after his/her death, except for the cases provided for by Article 32 of this Law." By that standard the author would need to have died before 1950, unless the sculptor is unknown in which case the statue would need to have been erected before 1950. Since it was "built in 1965", it seems neither condition has been met: I've nominated for deletion on Commons. (t · c) buidhe 16:57, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Hey buidhe, while you're correct on the underlying legal framework, I'm not convinced this particular obelisk is sufficiently original to qualify for copyright protection - at least in the US. Your thoughts? Nikkimaria (talk) 17:12, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Nikkimaria I don't know much about threshold of originality for 3-d works. For this, it's hard to say which elements are sculptural and which are damage... (t · c) buidhe 17:15, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Think it's mostly damage, though agreed it's hard to tell. KM, do you have a better sense? Nikkimaria (talk) 17:44, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

(outdent) Lots of monuments around Georgia are in rough shape, and I would suspect this one is also like that, but I wouldn't be able to say for sure. Knowing that it is located out of the way on a side road (I lived right by there for a time, it's not close to anything) I would think that is damage, though. Kaiser matias (talk) 00:57, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

• Other images are freely licensed (t · c)

mindmanager pro6 s/no: mp61-935-mp79-2a85-1ca3

serial avg 7.0.338 com firewal

s/n: 70-thxmv1-p2-c21-seslm-ff2-24t3
or
70-thxmv1-pb-c21-s52cx-vfh-abv1

adobe photoshop cs v8.0

avast pro 4.6

registry mechanic 6.0

avast4.7 proffesional [expired]

system mechanic
name: teddy rogers serial: 75808-s4161-2535696465

system mechanic
name: teddy rogers serial: 76798-p4062-3545597475

system mechanic professional

photoshop cs2 v.9

avast 4.7 home

avg 7,0
serial:70-th17m6-p4-c01-smf9c-7yq-bhpw

sound forge 7.0

s.n.(0x4040): hq-1hjj4l-rcmvmc-z5hq3k | hq-2nxrkp-352724-fwxhkv | hq-djkpe5-

sound forge 6,0

real player plus 8.0 beta s/n: 0284-12-4669

real player plus 8.0 s/n: 0684-96-5548

real player plus 8.0 s/n: 0684-96-5548 or s/n: 0444-90-4466

real slideshow plus 2.0 s/n: 473-46997-6031

realdownload 4.0 plus s/n: qu4xutsx

quickbooks pro 2000 cdkey: 2301-119-921-1206 reg: 022321299116

password keeper 5.7 name: wizdaz[ecl] company: eclipse s/n: 246172624

password keeper 5.8 name: demian company: tnt! s/n: 202114928

password kernel 1.1 tempcode: conger permcode: turtle

password manager 2.0 name: tuc pc2k s/n: 6987-8486-8886-1238

pc cillin 2000 7.22 s/n: pcew-0018-9337-4391-8383

pc cillin 2000 7.23 winnt: pcew-0018-9337-4391-8383 win9x: pcew-0011-4881-2059-

pc cillin 2000 7.51 s/n: pcew-0018-9337-4391-8383

pc cillin 98 6.07 s/n: pcef-0015-4507-0807-5135 or s/n: pcew-0017-1511-0500-8915

pc telephone 2.0 name: team laxity email: laxity@lxt.cbj.net s/n: 6270a398415b1ef8

photoshop 5.5 retail s/n: pww500r3293485-221

photoshop 5.0 le s/n: spm500b1403180-743

photoshop 6.0 beta 3 s/n: exx600b6311279-428

photoshop 5.0 upgrade s/n: pww304x1101627-342

photoshop 6.0 le s/n: spm500b1403180-743

platypus animator 4.25 name: jumpbull [evc] s/n: jqdjpp

platypus animator 5.1 name: nemesis] tnt s/n: jeoful

platypus javascript editor 1.22 name: team elila s/n: k1p4ejoa

platypus javascript editor 1.22 name: team elila s/n: k1p4ejoa or name: nemesis
tnt s/n: v_pcfjqo

platypus web builder 1.5 name: nemesis] tnt s/n: t_bceqqk

adobe photoshop cs2

adobe photoshop cs2

adobe photoshop cs2

adobe photoshop cs2

adobe photoshop cs2

adobe photoshop cs2

adobe photoshop cs2

photoshop cs2
1045-1089-8323-2695-4174-8285

soundforge 7.0
hq-ehv1w8-pk36db-7mm6vt hq-drkhxm-tmyqhb-yqqfp9

soundforge 7.0
hq-6lynrl-kd1zem-5yqj41

soundforge 7.0
hq-2wzp2x-bj3jbv-7hwjpj

sony sound forge serial by astalavista

sony sound forge audio studio v7.0b

passwords & keys 1.0.1

s/n: name: tdr6p6-sv66 or tdvs6-mn3

serial: 202194188 or 163110263